English : Stop destructive palm oil - EU must say no to palm oil for energy and transport fuel

Stop destructive palm oil - EU must say no to palm oil for energy and transport fuel

Brussels/Amsterdam, November 2007 - Green campaigners warn that proposals for certifying palm oil as sustainable are flawed. As the Round Table for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) presented proposals to label sustainable palm oil last month, Friends of the Earth groups staged an installation of screaming tree stumps outside the meeting in Brussels, representing the current environmental violations caused by producing palm oil.


	22.11.2007

Ill.photo: K. Olerud

- The Round Table for Sustainable Palm Oil's plan to prevent destruction in producer countries is flawed, and is particularly bound for failure if the EU demand for palm oil as an energy and transport fuel continues to grow, Paul de Clerck, of Friends of the Earth Europe said.

Accepting a mini-banner from Mr de Clerck, RSPO Chairman Jan Kees Vis thanked him and said that he fully shared Friends of the Earth's concerns about biomass and using palm oil for energy.

The RSPO has developed criteria for producing sustainable palm oil and the first RSPO-certified palm oil is expected to be on the market by December 2007. But the Friends of the Earth groups warn that the sustainability criteria are not strict enough. [1]

The environmental organisations highlight that the RSPO could give sustainability certifications on a plantation-by-plantation basis, so a company could get a stamp of approval
based on only one 'model' plantation, while other plantations are not sustainable. Current violations include deforestation, the illegal burning of land, high pesticide use and land right conflicts.

- Inevitably, palm oil companies will use a sustainability certification to greenwash, flaunting it in all their publicity, even though it will by no means guarantee that the company is guilt-free of environmental and social violations. The RSPO must refuse to certify palm oil coming from any company still involved in destructive palm oil production, Mr de Clerck said.

The Friends of the Earth groups call for the EU to reject palm oil for energy and transport fuel, cautioning that EU demand for palm oil will drive conversion of forest to plantations on a scale far beyond that which the RSPO could guarantee is sustainable. For example, Indonesia and Malaysia plan to double their palm oil area to 18-22 million hectares, an area more than five times the size of the Netherlands. With this dramatic trend in mind, the RSPO can not provide the solution for the problems resulting from the growing demand for palm oil.

Large companies keen to start up RSPO certified plantations are likely to push other farming
activities into previously unfelled areas of forest. This "leakage effect" is another shortcoming of the RSPO system - a plantation could be certified as "sustainable" even though it has indirectly caused further deforestation.

Over recent years, many palm oil companies have been in conflict with the environment and local communities. A recent study by Friends of the Earth showed that there are grave environmental and social problems on plantations owned by Wilmar, the world's biggest palm oil trader and a prominent RSPO member.[2]

Click here to download print quality photos of the action by the Friends of the Earth groups

For more information, please contact:
- Rosemary Hall, Communications Officer at Friends of the Earth Europe, tel: +32 2 542 6105; mobile: +32 485 930515; Email: rosemary.hall@foeeurope.org
- Paul de Clerck, Corporates Campaign Co-ordinator at Friends of the Earth Europe, tel: +32 2 542 6107; mobile: +32 494 380959; Email: paul.de.clerck@foeeurope.org

Notes:

[1] Specific criticisms of the sustainability criteria include:
- If a plantation is on land cleared before 2005, it could be classed as sustainable, even if the manner in which the deforestation happened was illegal and created land rights conflicts.
- Dangerous pesticides and other chemicals could still be used on "sustainable" plantations.
- A company could have just one "sustainable" plantation and then use its sustainability certification in wider publicity, even if all its other plantations are not sustainable.
- A plantation could be classed as sustainable even if a large company has pushed other farming activities into previously unfelled areas of forest.

Click here to read the full RSPO criteria

[2] http://www.foeeurope.org/press/2007/July3_PDC_Wilmar_PalmOil.htm